Good morning from Chicago! We will start Day 3 (last day) of the 10th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication. @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social / peerreviewcongress.org/peer-review-… #PRC10 <— This hashtag will give you all the posts! You can also click on this feed, created by @retropz.bsky.social: bsky.app/profile/did:…
Continue reading “Peer Review Congress Chicago – Day 3”Tag: education
Peer Review Congress Chicago – Day 2
Good morning from Chicago, where we are getting ready for Day 2 of the 10th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication. peerreviewcongress.org / @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social / #PRC10
Peer Review Congress Chicago – Day 1
It’s Peer Review Week! A perfect time to post my notes from the 10th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, which was held at the Swissôtel in Chicago, two weeks ago, September 3-5, 2025.
This was my first time attending this congress. I tried to live-post all the talks on BlueSky [except for one session where I sneaked out].
You can find most posts about this conference under the hashtag #PRC10 on BlueSky or X. Andrew Porter @retropz.bsky.social, Research Integrity and Training Adviser at the Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, created a BlueSky feed as well.
This post will contain (lightly edited) notes from Day 1. Click here to see the posts from [Day 2] and [Day 3].
Continue reading “Peer Review Congress Chicago – Day 1”Science Integrity Digest Summer 2025
It is hard to find the time to post here. I’m getting lots of requests to help scanning papers for image problems, and am also traveling a lot to give talks and be in panels. So my ‘monthly’ digests have now turned into quarterly digests, hahaha.
These past months, I have traveled to Berlin to receive the Einstein Foundation Award, to Oxford for the FAIRS Meeting, participated in a workshop in Stockholm organized by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences about the Reformation of Science Publishing, a conference in London at the Royal Society about the Future of Science Publishing, and a gathering with other science detectives and journalists in Krakow, Poland. In between, I gave several talks at research institutions and medical schools. I am getting pretty good at packing suitcases!
Here is a round-up of some noteworthy articles about research integrity.
Continue reading “Science Integrity Digest Summer 2025”Science Integrity Digest, September 2024
An overview of general news and articles about science integrity and some cases that I have worked on.
Science sleuths
- The Rise of the Science Sleuths – When an Alzheimer’s paper came under scrutiny, correcting the scientific record meant battling much bigger problems – Jessica Wapner – Undark
- Sleuths unearthing malpractice should receive gratitude, not hostility. The British Museum learned it was wrong to brush off a whistleblower. Universities and journals should do the same, says David Sanders – David Sanders – Times Higher Education

Neuroscientist and top NIH official under scrutiny
- Picture Imperfect – Scores of papers by Eliezer Masliah, prominent neuroscientist and top NIH official, fall under suspicion – Charles Piller – Science
- Statement by NIH on Research Misconduct Findings – National Institutes of Health
- Fraud, So Much Fraud – Derek Lowe – Science
- Leading Neuroscientist Accused of Research Misconduct – Jessica Blake – Inside Higher Ed
- A top government scientist engaged in research misconduct, NIH finds – Associated Press
- Prominent NIH Neuroscientist Fired Over Alleged Research Misconduct – Megan Brooks – Medscape

Q-Collar under scrutiny
- This Device Is ‘Proven’ to Protect Athletes’ Brains. The Science Is Under Fire. – Stephanie M Lee – The Chronicle of Higher Education
- [from December 2022:] Will This Device Protect Athletes’ Brains, or Only Make Them Think It Does? – Matthew Futterman – New York Times [free-access link]
Nobel prize winner under scrutiny
- Nobel prize-winner tallies two more retractions, bringing total to 13 – Ellie Kincaid – Retraction Watch

Paper Mills
- Widespread signs of paper milling discovered in materials science and engineering papers – Julia Robinson – Chemistry World
New ORI regulations
The US Office of Research Integrity updated its regulations on handling research misconduct allegations. Key updates include clarifying the inquiry process and adjusting how institutions should handle the allegations and record the process.
- Final U.S. misconduct rule drops controversial changes. Biomedical oversight agency replaces proposal to publicize institutional findings with smaller steps toward greater transparency – Jeffrey Mervis – Science
- Colleges Get More Leeway to Handle Research Misconduct – Christa Dutton – The Chronicle of Higher Education
- ORI Issues Final Changes to Research Misconduct Regulations: Key Reforms and Lingering Complexities – Ropes and Gray Law Offices
- Research misconduct claims are growing. Will new rules help universities investigate? Scientific sleuths say the updated rules aren’t enough to make a dent in research integrity violations – Anil Oza – STAT In the Lab
- New HHS rules can’t address the primary reason for research misconduct. Publish or perish must perish – Paul Martin Jensen – STAT Opinion
1 in 7 scientific articles might be fake
James Heathers published a preprint arguing that the old, often-cited number that 2% of papers are fake is outdated and a vast underestimate. In a new preprint, he argues it might be 1 in 7 papers, based on 12 studies that together analyze 75,000 scientific articles.
- How Much Science Is Fake? – James Heathers – OSF
- 1 in 7 scientific papers is fake, suggests study that author calls ‘wildly nonsystematic’ – Dalmeet Singh Chawla – Retraction Watch
Francesca Gino lawsuit
- How a Scientific Dispute Spiralled Into a Defamation Lawsuit – What does a Harvard Business School professor’s decision to sue the professors who raised questions about her research bode for academic autonomy? By Gideon Lewis-Kraus – New Yorker
- She Sued the Sleuths Who Found Fraud in Her Data. A Judge Just Ruled Against Her. – Stephanie M. Lee – The Chronicle of Higher Education
Around the world
- India’s research crime is getting worse. Scientists are gaming peer review system. International watchdogs are flagging India as a top producer of ‘low-quality and fraudulent’ research. Last year, India ranked behind only China and the US – Soumya Pillai – The Print
- Transparency and Integrity Risks in China’s Research Ecosystem: A Primer and Call To Action – Jeffrey Stoff, Leslie McIntosh, An Chi Lee
- New academic AI guidelines aim to curb research misconduct. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the country’s top science institute, on Tuesday published new guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research, as part of its efforts to improve scientific integrity and reduce research misconduct, such as data fabrication and plagiarism. – Zhang Weilan – Global Times
New Publication and Editorials
- Quantifying Data Distortion in Bar Graphs in Biological Research. We developed a framework to quantify data distortion and analyzed bar graphs published across 3387 articles in 15 journals, finding consistent data distortions across journals and common biological data types. – Lin and Landry – bioRxiv
- Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause – Duncan E. Wright – FEBS Letters
- Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education – Sarah Elaine Eaton, Jamie J. Carmichael, Helen Pethrick, eds., Minerva
- GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar: Key features, spread, and implications for preempting evidence manipulation – Haider et al. – Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
- Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science – Koo and Lin – Heliyon
- Legal and Operational Aspects of Compliance with Scientific Integrity – Weber-Mandrin et al. Chimia
- Tracing the Retraction Cascade: Identifying Non-retracted but Potentially Retractable Articles – Usman and Balke – Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries
Retraction Watch’s Weekend Reads:
- September 7: Weekend reads: A plethora of misdeeds; big slowdown at several publishers; hydroxychloroquine paper retraction draws scrutiny
- September 14: Weekend reads: Lawsuits filed and dismissed; ‘the rise of the science sleuths;’ research assessment culture
- September 21: Weekend reads: Harm reduction for peer review; finding reviewers; fake journals
- September 28: Weekend reads: Top NIH neuroscientist out amid suspicion; the issue with special issues; an ingredient derailed experiments
Science Integrity Digest, August 2024
Your monthly digest of science integrity news.
General Science Integrity News
- The staggering death toll of scientific lies. Scientific fraud kills people. Should it be illegal? – Kelsey Piper – Vox
- What’s in a picture? Two decades of image manipulation awareness and action – Mike Rossner – Retraction Watch
- He was a rising star of academia with multiple papers. He was also a cat
- Researcher creates fake profile for pet to expose flaws in Google Scholar website that allow scientists to fraudulently boost their credibility – Rhys Blakely – The Times
- The Academic Culture of Fraud. The trustees maintain that the fraud arose from “lab culture and management,” and therefore implicitly that there is no single individual who bears moral or procedural responsibility for actually falsifying the data. – Ben Landau-Taylor – Palladium
- Retracted Alzheimer’s Paper Reshapes Research Landscape, but Progress Continues – Science Blog
- Optimizing research integrity investigations: the need for evidence – Dorothy Bishop – The Bishop Blog
Sleuthing
- Journal of Molecular Liquids vs One-Man Papermills – Mu Yang catches two crooks, Ayman Atta and S Muthu, who flooded one Elsevier journal (and several others) with ridiculous hand-drawn fraud. Whom to believe, the peer review, or your own eyes? – Leonid Schneider – For Better Science
- With Random Precision. Papermills continue to appear on the scene (or rather, they have been there all along, waiting to be noticed) and once again we find ourselves with shovels and brooms, cleaning up after the performing elephants. – Smut Clyde – For Better Science
- Scientific whistleblowers can be compensated for their service. To help correct the incentives, Ben Laundau-Taylor suggests that science could borrow an idea from the US financial system, where an SEC bounty program pays whistleblowers 10-30% of the fines imposed by the government. – Chris Said
- The citation black market: schemes selling fake references alarm scientists – The ways in which researchers can artificially inflate their reference counts are growing – Dalmeet Singh Chawla – Nature News
- Oxford Brookes professor awarded for academic integrity work – Professor Mary Davis has been given a National Teaching Fellowship, which celebrates individuals who have made an outstanding impact on student outcomes and teaching in higher education. – OxfordMail
- Mandyam Srinivasan of bee studies fame faces misconduct allegations. Based on his work on bees, Srinivasan received an award from IISc in 2009 among other honours, but two biologists have now called 10 of his papers into question – T V Padma – The Hindu
Legal threats for science critics
- Exclusive: Kavli prize winner threatens to sue critic for defamation. One of the winners of the 2024 Kavli Prize in nanoscience has threatened to sue a longtime critic, Retraction Watch has learned. – Ellie Kincaid – Retraction Watch
- Award-winning chemist threatens to sue critic – Dalmeet Singh Chawla – Chemistry World
- PNAS corrects article by Kavli prize winner who threatened to sue critic – Retraction Watch
- Whistleblowing in science: this physician faced ostracization after standing up to pharma – Physician scientist Nancy Olivieri describes hard-won lessons from decades of fighting for scientific integrity – Nature News
Federal and institutional investigations
- Former Maryland dept. chair with $19 million in grants faked data in 13 papers, feds say. A former department chair engaged in research misconduct in work funded by 19 grants from the National Institutes of Health, according to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity. – Ellie Kincaid – Retraction Watch
- Senior biochemist made up data in 13 studies – US Office of Research Integrity report aligns with investigation by the University of Maryland, Baltimore -Dalmeet Singh Chawla, special to C&EN
- Case Summary: Eckert, Richard L – Office of Research Integrity
- Faked heart papers retracted following Ohio State investigation – Dawn Attride – Retraction Watch
- NOAA agrees to restore ‘scientific integrity’ in its influential $1 billion climate disaster tally – In response to the study by Roger Pielke Jr., NOAA said it will take steps to address the flaws in its methodology in its “billion dollar disaster” tally, used as a touchstone by media and policymakers. – Kevin Killough – Just The News
- Data integrity is ‘biggest issue’ for drug, API firms during inspections, FDA official says – Jeff Craven – Regulatory Focus
Publishers taking action
- Exclusive: Publisher retracts more than 450 papers from journal it acquired last year. Sage has retracted 467 articles from the Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, a title it took on when it acquired IOS Press last November for an undisclosed sum. – Retraction Watch
- Sleuths spur cleanup at journal with nearly 140 retractions and counting. The mass retractions began over a year after sleuths Alexander Magazinov and Guillaume Cabanac first raised concerns about the presence of suspicious citations, tortured phrases and undisclosed use of AI in the journal’s articles. – Avery Orrall – Retraction Watch
- Three MDMA therapy papers retracted over ethics violations – Meghana Keshavan – STAT News
Games
- The Publish or Perish Game – A Game Where We Embrace Plagiarism and The Reviewer 2 In Us
- UOW Age of Integrity – Game-based learning on Academic Integrity – European Network for Academic Integrity / University of Wollongong
Artificial intelligence and science
- Flood of ‘junk’: How AI is changing scientific publishing. Several experts who track down problems in studies told AFP that the rise of AI has turbocharged the existing problems in the multi-billion-dollar sector. – Daniel Lawler – AFP/Yahoo News
- AI scientists have a problem: AI bots are reviewing their work – ChatGPT is wreaking chaos in the field that birthed it – Stephanie M Lee – The Chronicle of Higher Education
- Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly. Artificial-intelligence developers are buying access to valuable data sets that contain research papers — raising uncomfortable questions about copyright – Elizabeth Gibney – Nature
- Is ChatGPT a Reliable Ghostwriter? Irène Buvat and Wolfgang A. Weber – The Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Is AI my co-author? The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific publishing – Barton Moffatt and Alicia Hall – Accountability in Research
- A new ‘AI scientist’ can write science papers without any human input. Here’s why that’s a problem – Karin Verspoor – The Conversation
- Three ways to promote critical engagement with GenAI – However much we fear its impact or despise its outputs, when teaching humanities, the best response is to encourage students to engage with it critically – Neville Morley – Times Higher Education
- Colloquium explores ethical dilemmas arising from the use of AI and Big Data in research – University of the Witwatersrand
- Statement on Harnessing Science and Technology to Address the Challenges of Today and Open Doors to the Future – Chief Science Advisors representing Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States – The Whitehouse
New Publication and Editorials
- Prevalence of plagiarism in hijacked journals: A text similarity analysis. These findings suggest a tendency for fraudulent journals to attract authors who do not uphold scientific integrity principles. – Anna Abalkina – Accountability in Research
- The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings – Minal M Caron et al. – Accountability in Research
- Anxiety in Academia: The Impact of Predatory Journals on Researchers and Scientific Integrity [published in a predatory journal?] – Chad G Pettee and Briac Halbou – Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences
- Should We Publish Fewer Papers? By this proposition, I am not advocating that we all “slack off”, but rather that we work harder to make sure we publish fewer but higher quality papers with new and significant scientific insights instead of reporting routine or incremental studies in large numbers of papers.- Song Jin – ACS Energy Letters
- Preserving Academic Integrity: Combating the Proliferation of Paper Mills in Scholarly Publishing – Poonam Singh Deo and P. Hangsing – Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries
- It Takes a Village! Editorship, Advocacy, and Research in Running an Open Access Data Journal – Mandy Wigdorowitz et al. – Publications
Retraction Watch’s Weekend Reads:
- August 3: Weekend reads: Happy birthday, Retraction Watch!; a mysterious conference; extreme publishing; research parasites revisited
- August 10: Weekend reads: Publish or perish, the card game; revisiting fraud in anesthesiology; the Hindawi mass retraction timeline
- August 17: Weekend reads: MDMA papers retracted; COVID-19 vaccine paper retracted for the second time; who gets cited more?
- August 24: Weekend reads: Why scientist rankings should be ignored; misconduct claims in court; mining company demands retraction
- August 31: Weekend reads: When retracted work is cited; another retraction for a Nobelist; should scientific fraud be illegal?
