In this blog post I will talk about scientific papers that use false affiliations or fake authors.
In scientific papers, the “affiliation” is the institute that each author belongs to. It is usually listed below the author names, as the “department, university” of the institute each authors worked at during the time that the study was conducted.
Continue reading “False affiliations and fake authors”This blog post is not intended to be an allegation of misconduct. I am just wondering about unclear affiliations, findings, and ethics approval. Be aware that this post contains links to articles about sexual activities and suicide. These links are intended for mature audiences only and might contain sensitive material that is NSFW.
A Gizmodo article by Jennings Brown, published in March 2019, describes the curious case of The Fake Sex Doctor Who Conned the Media Into Publicizing His Bizarre Research on Suicide, Butt-Fisting, and Bestiality.
Continue reading “The Sexpert papers”
The 6h World Conference on Research Integrity is currently happening in Hong Kong. You can follow all the tweets using the hashtag #WCRI2019. Thanks to many nice people who are live-tweeting from the conference, all of us who could not be there can still follow the conference from a distance.
Continue reading “World Conference on Research Integrity”A post about another “peer reviewed” paper published by World Scientific publishers (not included in any predatory publisher list that I could find). Based on this Twitter thread.
This paper is written by the same first author on the pregnancy/virus model from my previous post, a cardiology doctor from Rome. According to his website he “graduated with honors in Medicine and Surgery from the University of Rome “La Sapienza” and is now publishing under the affiliation of the Guglielmo Marconi University in Rome.
The paper was published in the International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics – which seem to have a consistent problem with the quality of their peer review.
Continue reading “Surfing the water-DNA waves”Note: this post has been updated on June 4, to include new information that the author was not affiliated with the RIAAM institute at the time of publishing his papers. The RIAAM takes this false affiliation very seriously and distances itself from the author’s views and ideas.
This blog post – again – is based on a Twitter thread (here is the unroll if you like that better). It is about a nuclear physicist who works has previously worked at the Research Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics of Maragha (RIAAM) in Iran.
Here is a weekly digest of science integrity related articles. Also, check out Retraction Watch‘s Weekend Reads!
Continue reading “Weekly Digest, June 1, 2019”Just a quick post: Stephanie M. Lee, a science reporter at BuzzFeed posted an article today about the “YXQ-EQ” papers that I discussed on Twitter and in a recent post. It’s a nice story on the concerns that several scientists have about the invisible life force that might kill cancer cells – but that can only be emitted by one researcher.
“A Scientist Keeps Claiming His Life Force Can Somehow Kill Cancer Cells, And Researchers Are Calling Him Out” – Stephanie M. Lee – BuzzFeed – May 30, 2019
Continue reading “BuzzFeed article about the “YXQ-EQ” papers”This is Part 3 of a series of 3, which also includes Part 1: Plagiarism, and Part 2: Falsification.
In Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, I showed some examples of plagiarism and falsification in scientific papers, which the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) considers two of the three forms of Research Misconduct. Here, we will look at the third type of misconduct, fabrication. ORI defines fabrication as follows:
Continue reading “What is Research Misconduct? Part 3: Fabrication”“Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them.”
Office of Research Integrity: Definition of Research Misconduct
This is Part 2 of a series of 3, which also includes Part 1: Plagiarism, and Part 3: Fabrication.
In Part 1 of this series, I showed some examples of plagiarism in scientific papers, which the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) considers one of the three forms of Research Misconduct. Here, we will look at the second type of misconduct, falsification. ORI defines falsification as follows:
Continue reading “What is Research Misconduct? Part 2: Falsification”“Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.”
Office of Research Integrity: Definition of Research Misconduct
This is Part 1 of a series of 3, which also includes Part 2: Falsification, and Part 3: Fabrication.
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI), part of the USA Department of Health and Human Services, defines Research Misconduct on their website:
Let’s clarify that a bit more with some examples. In this blog post, I will discuss plagiarism.
Continue reading “What is Research Misconduct? Part 1: Plagiarism”
Science Integrity Digest 